<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Every Tale Condemns Me for a Villain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawrence.lib.ks.us/2013/02/every-tale-condemns-me-for-a-villain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawrence.lib.ks.us/2013/02/every-tale-condemns-me-for-a-villain/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:25:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.lawrence.lib.ks.us/2013/02/every-tale-condemns-me-for-a-villain/#comment-15501</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 01:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawrence.lib.ks.us/?p=16956#comment-15501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow!  Thanks for the reading list!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  Thanks for the reading list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evie Rapport</title>
		<link>http://www.lawrence.lib.ks.us/2013/02/every-tale-condemns-me-for-a-villain/#comment-15492</link>
		<dc:creator>Evie Rapport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawrence.lib.ks.us/?p=16956#comment-15492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Josephine Tey was also my entry to Richard III a long time ago, and I still believe many of her arguments are sound. I too found the Richard III Museum on the wall in York beguiling and weirdly appealing -- &quot;hole-in-the-wall&quot; quite literally as well. Besides the sources Dan mentions (and Ian McKellan&#039;s version of Shakespeare&#039;s play is wonderful), I found these interesting; most of them are in the library:
-- Desmond Seward&#039;s &quot;The Wars of the Roses: Through the Lives of Five Men and Women of the Fifteenth Century,&quot; which goes past Bosworth to 1499. Seward is sternly unsympathetic to Richard but it&#039;s a good overview of the events and powerful personalities.
-- Sharon Kay Penman&#039;s &quot;The Sunne in Splendour&quot; is terrific historical fiction; Richard, whom she calls Dickon, is the central character although it follows the Wars of the Roses from 1459 through Edward IV to Richard&#039;s reign. She&#039;s clearly a Ricardian and puts forth a very good argument for another candidate as murderer of the princes. 
-- Al Pacino&#039;s video &quot;Searching for Richard&quot; examines how an actor creates a famous character in a play that is completely at odds with historical reality.
-- Elizabeth George is also a Ricardian and brings the controversy into her early Thomas Lynley mystery &quot;Well-Schooled in Murder&quot; and some other works.
I do wish a similar forensic examination could be made of the children&#039;s bones found in the crumbling old royal residence at the Tower of London in King Charles II&#039;s reign. They were identified as the princes whom Alison Weir writes about (and several others, notably Elizabeth Jenkins); the bones were inurned in Westminster Abbey and they will not be disturbed, it&#039;s been announced.
I was fascinated to see the reconstruction of Richard III&#039;s face. It&#039;s very like the image at the National Portrait Gallery in London -- I have a tea towel of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josephine Tey was also my entry to Richard III a long time ago, and I still believe many of her arguments are sound. I too found the Richard III Museum on the wall in York beguiling and weirdly appealing &#8212; &#8220;hole-in-the-wall&#8221; quite literally as well. Besides the sources Dan mentions (and Ian McKellan&#8217;s version of Shakespeare&#8217;s play is wonderful), I found these interesting; most of them are in the library:<br />
&#8211; Desmond Seward&#8217;s &#8220;The Wars of the Roses: Through the Lives of Five Men and Women of the Fifteenth Century,&#8221; which goes past Bosworth to 1499. Seward is sternly unsympathetic to Richard but it&#8217;s a good overview of the events and powerful personalities.<br />
&#8211; Sharon Kay Penman&#8217;s &#8220;The Sunne in Splendour&#8221; is terrific historical fiction; Richard, whom she calls Dickon, is the central character although it follows the Wars of the Roses from 1459 through Edward IV to Richard&#8217;s reign. She&#8217;s clearly a Ricardian and puts forth a very good argument for another candidate as murderer of the princes.<br />
&#8211; Al Pacino&#8217;s video &#8220;Searching for Richard&#8221; examines how an actor creates a famous character in a play that is completely at odds with historical reality.<br />
&#8211; Elizabeth George is also a Ricardian and brings the controversy into her early Thomas Lynley mystery &#8220;Well-Schooled in Murder&#8221; and some other works.<br />
I do wish a similar forensic examination could be made of the children&#8217;s bones found in the crumbling old royal residence at the Tower of London in King Charles II&#8217;s reign. They were identified as the princes whom Alison Weir writes about (and several others, notably Elizabeth Jenkins); the bones were inurned in Westminster Abbey and they will not be disturbed, it&#8217;s been announced.<br />
I was fascinated to see the reconstruction of Richard III&#8217;s face. It&#8217;s very like the image at the National Portrait Gallery in London &#8212; I have a tea towel of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginger Vermooten</title>
		<link>http://www.lawrence.lib.ks.us/2013/02/every-tale-condemns-me-for-a-villain/#comment-15083</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger Vermooten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawrence.lib.ks.us/?p=16956#comment-15083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daughter of Time has been a favorite of mine for over four decades, and I just reread it--again--after the identification of Richard III&#039;s remains. Aside from rehabilitating a well known villain, it has other truly delightful moments, including a discussion of &#039;Tonypandy.&#039; (We all of us should know about tonypandy: it&#039;s all around us.)

I&#039;m a staunch Ricardian now, and hope that others will join this somewhat exclusive group. Josephine Tey&#039;s book is a great way to get started.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daughter of Time has been a favorite of mine for over four decades, and I just reread it&#8211;again&#8211;after the identification of Richard III&#8217;s remains. Aside from rehabilitating a well known villain, it has other truly delightful moments, including a discussion of &#8216;Tonypandy.&#8217; (We all of us should know about tonypandy: it&#8217;s all around us.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a staunch Ricardian now, and hope that others will join this somewhat exclusive group. Josephine Tey&#8217;s book is a great way to get started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
