Chickens with superpowers, a farm full of junk to explore, and a series of mysterious typewritten letters are just a few of the wonders within this year’s Read Across Lawrence for Kids title, Unusual Chickens for the Exceptional Poultry Farmer, by Kelly Jones. Jones, who recently answered a few of my questions about the book, will be available via Skype at the library on Sunday, February 19th, from 1:30-2:30 p.m. to answer more questions from kids (between bites of free pizza donated by Rudy’s). Join us for this and the other events we’ve put together this month with the help of KU Libraries and the Friends of the Library to celebrate this unique book. Read More..
In the Spotlight
I treasure wildlife sightings. During the winter season I sometimes glimpse bald eagles soaring in the sky outside my kitchen window, and I’ve been fortunate on several occasions to see beavers swimming in the Haskell-Baker Wetlands. Last summer my East Lawrence neighbors and I were frequently serenaded by the territorial calls of barred owls. Being reminded that wildlife still thrives nearby is reassuring for the future of our environmental heritage. Read More..
I’ve always been the kind of person who nurtures small obsessions. Case in point: there was a time in middle school when I was not infrequently introduced to people as “Meredith, that girl who likes Buffy.”
It was an extremely fair introduction. I discovered Buffy, the Vampire Slayer in the fourth or fifth grade, and I rapidly became obsessed. When my local cable affiliate dropped the WB, I spent two years getting up in the wee hours to watch new episodes when they re-aired on Fox at 3:30 a.m. (This was a pre-DVR era.) I delayed my fourteenth birthday party by more than three months so that the “theme” of the party could be “let’s get a group of 25 people together and watch the first episode of season 7 live.” Read More..
When I was a little girl, I lived in a very small town with a very small library, but I had a very big appetite for reading books. I devoured everything at my public library and, wanting more, my mother made the excellent parenting decision to allow me to purchase one book per week at the nearest now-defunct entertainment store (spoiler alert: it was Hastings). I resented her for making me make such a difficult decision (only one?!), but I took it on as a challenge to find the best book, and for the first time, I was completely overwhelmed by choices. Read More..
By now, you’re probably aware of the recent Facebook trend of sharing a list of 10 albums that influenced your teenage years. Perhaps you even made one yourself.
While many see it as a way to reflect on the music that shaped your youth in a meaningful way, others have viewed it as a self-absorbed opportunity to present a revisionist version of one’s past. I’ll take it as an opportunity to promote the library’s CD and digital music collection! Read More..
Netflix has tapped into the way the world is feeling about 2017, releasing a television adaptation of Lemony Snicket’s beloved A Series of Unfortunate Events this month.
LPL’s resident Snicket fans Sarah and Fisher sat down to sort out their feelings about it— the good, the bad, and the extra unfortunate.
Fisher: When did you first start reading A Series of Unfortunate Events? I’m also curious to learn more about what attracted you to the book series.
Sarah: It was 2001. I took a Children’s Lit class at KU and we were lucky enough to speak with Lemony Snicket – AKA Daniel Handler – via speakerphone. Please remember, this was way before Skype! I wish I could go back and listen to that conversation again or at least find my notes from that time. We read The Bad Beginning and I was immediately hooked. It was unlike any children’s book I had read before- so dark and creepy. Yet, hilarious!
Fisher: I agree! I first read the books in Middle School around the time that The Wide Window came out. This may sound ultra nerdy, but my friends and I had our own VFD club where we would write each other notes in Sebald Code and scan the local papers for signs of mysterious fires. I’ve always had a darker sense of humor and liked that the series didn’t downplay the fact that sometimes awful things happen to the best of people.
Sarah: I have always loved the macabre too. But these books were different. Darker. I mean, The Boxcar Children were orphans, but they were at least having fun adventures. There seems to be a lot of orphans in children’s literature. I guess it opens up the stories and lets kids be free to do anything imaginable.
Fisher: What were your initial impressions after finishing the show? Did it make you happy as a book reader?
Sarah: Overall, yes. There were some changes made that, at first, I was unsure I would like, but I accepted as the episodes played out. Without getting into spoilers, there were characters who had more presence in the show than in the books. But their addition made sense, so I’m OK with it now. I’m sure Lemony Snicket will be happy to know I’m not mad about it.
Fisher: What’s interesting is that Lemony Snicket wrote most of the scripts for the show, so you know it’s canon. Part of what made the Netflix series so much fun was that it got rid of the tedium of the early books by breaking up the repetitive plot points with new storylines. I was genuinely surprised by some of the twists added to the story.
Sarah: Absolutely! If I have any issue with the books (and I barely do) it’s that reading them in succession, out-loud, to my daughter, can get a little redundant – different day, different disguise. The pace and the changes in the Netflix series were refreshing. (And, no worries, there is an abundance of amazing disguises). There are also plenty of easter eggs in the show that you wouldn’t have picked up if you hadn’t read the books.
Fisher: Like Very Fresh Dill or Count Olaf mentioning the disappearance of his sugar bowl. I like that it gives something new for fans who have read this series for the millionth time to watch instead of a scene-for-scene adaptation, which would have been a total snoozefest.
Sarah: Although, the books are darker, which I prefer. There were times when I thought Neil Patrick Harris should have played Olaf a little more diabolically and a little less dumb. Don’t get me wrong, Olaf is dumb, but he’s more eviI than anything. The combination is flipped in the Netflix series.
Fisher: So true. Like the later Harry Potter films, I think they will crank up the darkness as they move into the last few books while still retaining Snicket’s impeccable witticisms.
Sarah: Did you like how it looked stylistically? What about some of the modern day references (like when Olaf says he bought his hour glass on Amazon)?
Fisher: I feel that those elements gave it a whimsical vibe – a la Pushing Daisies, which was the perfect route for them to take. You can feel director Barry Sonnenfeld’s influence on the production design and cinematography. I think they purposely went with an overly CGI, saturated environment, which effectively translates many of the book’s motifs and general style to the screen.
Sarah: Well, they certainly went CGI on that baby’s face. Sorry, Sunny, but your face creeped me out and not in the right ways! However, I absolutely loved Patrick Warburton as Lemony Snicket. I can’t think of better casting than that. Perfection.
Fisher: I loved the opening scene where the Baudelaire orphans are on the beach and Patrick Warburton as Lemony Snicket is in a 50s style bathing romper narrating the story. I died laughing! He’s the MVP of the show, for sure. I’m also obsessed that the person of indeterminate gender is so aware of current events in the world around them and has some of the best side rants. It’s even more hilarious that Count Olaf doesn’t know what they are talking about half of the time.
Sarah: Yes! Olaf even says at one point, “I don’t understand any of these words that you’re saying.”
Fisher: I know right! It makes the tragedy of the Baudelaire orphans so much more tangible because this idiot manages to outwit all of the adults in the world even when the kids know exactly what he’s up to.
Well, if you haven’t already guessed, I’m a massive fan of a good book adaptation, so there are a couple of things I try to keep in mind when evaluating whether or not it’s successful. First, I like to see if the adaptation conveys the true essence of the source material. Second, if they do make significant changes, the changes need to make sense in the transition from print to visual media. Some of the best book adaptations like Game of Thrones understand how important these aspects are to fans. Like, you can change some elements along the way, but you have to maintain the integrity of the original work.
Sarah: Absolutely. Sometimes it can get tricky, though, when the author of the story also finds themselves in a screenwriting position. I think JK Rowling can struggle a bit because she wants to flush out the characters more and more and her audience is like, “But, maybe I didn’t need to know the genealogy of that wizard’s owl.” Stephen King is another one who comes to mind (and, for the record, I adore JK Rowling and Stephen King). But, remember when he made The Shining into a miniseries because he was unhappy with the Stanley Kubrick film? That didn’t go so well.
Fisher: Haha. However, you know there are some Harry Potter fans who would totally read a 1,000 page tome on owl genealogy if JK Rowling wrote it. It’s nice that Lemony Snicket can go back, revisit his earlier work, and in many ways improve it or answer lingering fan questions. I think we all wondered how Count Olaf came into guardianship of the Baudelaire orphans, and this series answers stuff like that. It makes me excited for future seasons because I felt that the books left us with so many cliffhangers that we may actually get some sense of closure – even if it is unfortunate. Overall, do you feel Netflix succeeded in creating a series that is better than the books?
Sarah: No, I think I still like the books more. What about you?
Fisher: As far as the earlier books go, I think that the show improved upon them by the addition of new material like we discussed before. I do like the show better in that regard. That being said, my opinion may change once they adapt some of my favorites in the series because I want them to play out just as I imagined. As a final aside, why do you think this series is so important for people to read or watch today?
Sarah: Dealing with struggles in an obviously make-believe way can help kids confront their own problems in real life. Obviously the situations are exaggerated, but Violet, Klaus, and Sunny are great role models. I love that the kids are the most intelligent people in the stories. Children can recognize when they’re being minimized. That’s hard for adults to understand, but Lemony Snicket gets it. Also, it’s just fantastic escapism. Everyone, regardless of age, can use more of that in their lives.
Fisher: I also think that this series helps bring a new perspective to situations. I got into A Series of Unfortunate Events when my life was in a bit of an upheaval. In a way, it was therapeutic to read about the perseverance of the Baudelaire orphans. No matter what terrible circumstances life threw at them, they were able to keep moving forward because they had each other for support. And, if you can think to yourself: at least there isn’t a murderous count who will stop at nothing to steal your enormous fortune, it helps you stay positive even when the world appears to be a bleak, dire, and oppressive place.
-Sarah Matthews and Fisher Adwell are public services assistants at Lawrence Public Library.
Introducing Audio Reader’s new Book Podcast program, with the wonderful Book Squad librarians from Lawrence Public Library!
Once a month, the librarians are in, with their favorite recommendations in Two Book Minimum, a toe-to-toe discussion on a book or topic in She Said/She Said, as well as news from the book world, updates from Lawrence Public Library, Audio Reader programs and beyond.
Though it is billed as the “teen” Read Across Lawrence pick, Return to Sender by Julia Alvarez is a highly recommended read for adults as well. Told through alternating perspectives, it is a story of friendship and conflict between teens from two different worlds, their families, and their communities. Tyler is the son of a Vermont dairy farm family in need of assistance in order to save their farm. Mari is the eldest daughter in a family of migrant workers who come to work for them. When Tyler learns that Mari’s family is in the country illegally and that his parents knew this when they were hired, the first of many questions about right and wrong surrounding immigration is raised. The reader must come to their own conclusions, though, as Return to Sender doesn’t provide any easy answers.
Miriam Wallen, Young Adult Librarian and coordinator for the Teen Zone, encourages readers to be inspired into action and help in sending books to immigrant children in the United States. Throughout the month of February, we will be collecting small donations to help purchase Spanish language and dual-language children’s books that will be sent to groups who work with immigrant children, especially with those traveling alone.
This book drive was inspired by REFORMA, a part of the American Library Association, and its Children in Crisis Program. REFORMA sends books to charities that work with immigrant children, as well as to border patrol facilities and pro-bono legal representatives.
You can read more about their activities in these articles:
- REFORMA Brings Books, Backpacks,and Support to Unaccompanied Minors
- A Path Forward: How Libraries Support Refugee Children
If you would like to contribute, look for the donation box at any Read Across Lawrence/ Big Read teen or adult programs. Alternatively, you can check out the list of requested books here or donate any Spanish Language or dual-language (Spanish and English) books you don’t need. Just drop them off in the Teen Zone!
If you are interested in more books about teen immigrant stories like Return to Sender, to read or discuss with your community, you can find some here!
In the words of REFORMA member and author Lucía M González:
“Un libro es un compañero que te da luz y cobijo”
(“A book is a companion that gives you light and shelter”)
-Kate Gramlich is a Reader’s Services Assistant at Lawrence Public Library.
(header img by Phil Roeder)
People react in a variety of ways when faced with hardship. Some people eat an entire box of ice cream by themselves or blow off steam at the rec center, and these are perfectly reasonable choices. These people, however, do not get books written about them.
Two recently-released titles—Goatmanand Welcome to Marwencol—present two incredible stories about the boundaries of creativity and escapism. Each book offers a look into a world where the desire to get away from it all is extrapolated with macro-sized reactions. Read More..
Last week I attended Kansas City Public Library’s Mock Newbery awards which basically looks like this: a bunch of librarians nerd out about a selection of books, then we vote on which one we believe is worthy of top honors. The criteria for the Newbery Award are just vague enough that a lot is left open to interpretation. For example, if a book contains illustrations, it is only to be considered if they detract from the book, not enhance it.
Therefore, it was a huge surprise last year when Last Stop on Market Street won top honors, when we (and many others) classify it as a picture book. Setting the rules and criteria aside, the Newbery was ultimately established to recognize excellence in Children’s Literature, and there have been some great picks over the years: The Giver, Holes, Flora & Ulysses. Even the list of Newbery Honor recipients (not even the winners!) is stacked with excellent books, like The War That Saved My Life, which was my pick for the Mock Newbery winner last year. Ultimately, if you pick up a book with that beautiful Newbery Award or Newbery Honor Award emblazoned on the cover, you are in for an excellent read. Here are three that I think were in close contention for this year’s Newbery Medal: Read More..